i'm not laughing at you, but rather at your comment. sorry, but for the sake of time I won't walk you through why WLS won't work for the little guys. search this board, i posted mathematical proof in several threads that shows the facts. i've done this at least 5 times and i dont feel like doing it again.garymayor said:Explain yourself please as I hear this all the time people just laff at you but I believe it'll be me laffing at you very soon.
Luc, if I may......garymayor said:WLS is a way for any one to have a go it doesn't matter how big you can bid on a auction at pool all the matters is when you know what domains will drop. Look into that and if WLS takes off you'll be a winner rarther than the big wallet players.
WebCat said:Luc, if I may......
Gary, he is not laughing AT you, he is laughing at the naiveté of your premise. Get out your calculator and do one simple calculation:
DicsountDrugs.com just sold for $30,000.00
Divide that by $39.00 and you get 769. With the WLS, that buyer COULD have bought 769 WLS slots for the price of ONE good domain now.
The "big" boys have MILLIONS to spend buying those little $39.00 WLS slots, and when they do, that domain is GONE GONE GONE......
Unless YOU have the millions- you will have NO shot at anything. These boys can and will (and probably already have) buy up the WLS slot on every decent domain that has any chance to drop in the next 5 years.
Sorry- game over, move on, find another way to play, because catching drops will be GONE GONE GONE!
Sorry if I sound like a pessimist, I'm just being realistic! It's the hard truth!
WebCat :'(
Gary. You talk about the old days but I don't think you were around for that long. If you were, you'd know that NameWinner had about the same success rate as SnapNames a year or two back. And they've been around for ages before pool.garymayor said:Hey mate what was going on before these auction systems came about???
Yojimbo said:The only way I can see that the "little guy" will be able to compete will be to pursue the names before they expire.
I agree with everything up to the last point. Most of the "little guys" won't have a CLUE, because they'll be too busy hating WLS and gnashing teeth to avoid self-fullfilling prophecy. I think the truest advantage of the well-equiped "little guy" will be as Duke and Catcher noted... Knowing a NICHE. Big players operating in "niche" areas, are ridiculous. Why has Apple returned to profitability? They stopped acting like a "big player" (got rid of the clones, stopped trying to compete in raw power) and went back to exploiting their "niche" (cutting edge technology, UI, and integration.) Big players can succeed in niches, but I believe it is the exception. Niche-names will look like CRAP names to big players. Small players can better monetize niche-names than big players ever will.mole said:The "little guy", are the WLS supporters.
Only dot-COM and dot-NET, Oxen. I think other registries have either decided not to ever do it, or have taken a "wait and see" approach. I can't remember which have said what though.oxen said:Is WLS only work for .com .net and .org?
Nexus said:I Niche-names will look like CRAP names to big players.
Nexus said:Only dot-COM and dot-NET, Oxen. I think other registries have either decided not to ever do it, or have taken a "wait and see" approach.
Nexus said:Only dot-COM and dot-NET, Oxen. I think other registries have either decided not to ever do it, or have taken a "wait and see" approach. I can't remember which have said what though.
~ Nexus
sacX said:Anyone have information on the current WLS time line for going live?