Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

3D related domain names?

Status
Not open for further replies.

namenut

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2006
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
People have recently pointed toward recent sales to justify 3D domain purchases and to point out that those who were skeptical are wrong.

The almost infinite number of domains like this balance that all out and show that the registrars are the ones making the most profit.

I would agree with your comment but would add that this principal applies to all areas of business and life.
Real Estate sales are based on recent sales. And very much justify current market trends.

Who do you think made more off the 1848 California gold/silver rush .... the miners or the hardware stores?
 

Diabro

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
130
Reaction score
13
I would agree with your comment but would add that this principal applies to all areas of business and life.
Real Estate sales are based on recent sales. And very much justify current market trends.

Who do you think made more off the 1848 California gold/silver rush .... the miners or the hardware stores?

Since in many places the owners of the hardware store owned big corporate mines and pretty much the whole town I would say the mining corporations.

But that does not mean people should make mistakes over and over. I have no problem with a person buying a few lottery tickets. When they are blowing a large amount on lottery tickets that also happen to carry renewal fees I get a little sick. Some of the names posted in this thread have ZERO chance of selling and unless you plan to develop they are a total waste of money.
Not a fan of some of the 3D technologies but with a 3D phone coming out I think market saturation makes the market pretty strong for good names.
Names like 3dtv-glasses.info have very little chance of selling IMHO.
 

Vijaya

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
FiOS TV to Premiere 10-Pack of 3D Movies
Planting another flag in the third dimension, Verizon in the next two months will debut 10 on-demand movies in 3D for FiOS TV customers to rent through deals with Walt Disney Pictures and Warner Bros. Digital Distribution.Eight of the titles will be available beginning Nov. 16: Disney's Chicken Little, Bolt and Meet the Robinsons, and Warner Bros.' Cats & Dogs: Revenge of Kitty Galore, Journey to the Center of the Earth, Under the Sea, Deep Sea and NASCAR.

In December, FiOS TV will add A Christmas Carol and the dance movie Step Up 3D. Verizon said more titles will follow early next year.

Pricing is still being determined but will likely be a bit higher than the regular HD VOD titles, which are $5.99 per rental, said Verizon spokeswoman Heather Wilner. The model is similar to 3D movies in the theater, which run a few dollars higher than tickets to regular movies, she added.

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/ar...Premiere_10_Pack_of_3D_Movies.php?rssid=20065
 

gilescoley

Level 7
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
807
Reaction score
59
I really wonder when all the 3D critics are going to start wondering about their stance on all this, so many of these articles are by industry giants

3D Rapidly Moving Into Cultural Mainstream
Cinema, TV, Healthcare Beneficiaries of New Technology
NEW YORK, Nov. 5, 2010 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- 3D, once seen as an interesting novelty, is quickly becoming an important part of our lives, both as a new form of entertainment and an important adjunct to many industries, according to top executives speaking at last week's conference, Paul Kagan's 3D Media Markets, Presented by Panasonic /quotes/comstock/13*!pc/quotes/nls/pc (PC 14.88, +0.10, +0.68%) .
The conference was organized and moderated by veteran analyst Paul Kagan, renowned for his extraordinary insights into and understanding of the complexities of the media industries.
Kagan brought together top executives from the worlds of entertainment, advertising and finance, to discuss and debate the growing influence and market potential for 3D technologies. It was highlighted by keynote addresses by DreamWorks Animation CEO, Jeffrey Katzenberg, Avatar Producer, Jon Landau, and RealD Chief Executive, Michael V. Lewis.
In addition, attendees heard from top executives from such companies as CBS Sports, Comcast, DirecTV, ESPN, and NVIDIA.
The 3D revolution, which recently began with motion pictures, is now spreading to television. According to Mr. Landau, the growing popularity of 3D on TV is causing the feature film industry to redouble its efforts to create even better 3D productions for the big screen.
Mr. Landau noted that Avatar's 3D version was removed from theaters only because of a shortage of 3D screens. Released when there were little more than 3,300 3D screens in the U.S. and less than 8,000 total world-wide, that number will, by next summer, grow to more than 30,000 world-wide, Mr. Katzenberg predicted.
"In less than 20 years, anything presented digitally in public forums will be presented in 3D," Mr. Katzenberg said, who also noted that in 2010, six of the top 10 movies are in 3D. By year's end, it will be eight of the top 12, he said.
"Every new communications or entertainment medium is greeted by customary doubts about its future," moderator, Paul Kagan said. "3D has not been exempt. But like TV, cable, cellphones and the Internet, 3D is destined to capture the attention and the hearts of the world's media consumers."
Major television programmers including CBS, DirecTV, Discovery Communications, and ESPN presented their visions for and development of dedicated 3D channels. Ken Aagaard of CBS Sports, which recently shot the U.S. Open Tennis tournament in 3D, noted that once company executives saw 3D, they were deeply impressed.
"We were amazed at the buy rates for 3D versions of the Masters and auto racing," added Comcast Senior Vice President, Mark Hess.
Panasonic has made a major commitment to 3D, both in terms of offering a wide range of consumer displays; the world's first professional, handheld 3D camera; and through a major programming commitment with DirecTV, helping to create America's first full-time 3D channel - n3D, Powered by Panasonic.
According to Panasonic Vice President, Jeff Cove, that commitment will fuel not just increased entertainment opportunities, but in addition, these new tools will help open up 3D to a wide range of other uses, including improving education, helping find recoverable oil and gas deposits more efficiently, cutting development costs in the automobile industry, and improving the accuracy of surgical procedures.
 

katherine

Country hopper
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
8,427
Reaction score
1,291
I really wonder when all the 3D critics are going to start wondering about their stance on all this, so many of these articles are by industry giants
And what does it mean to your bottom line ?
 

Diabro

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
130
Reaction score
13
And what does it mean to your bottom line ?
Exactly. When every TV and Movie is in 3D will I even say 3D anymore?

"Hey, why don't you come over for dinner and afterward we can watch some 3D TV?"

Or


"Hey, why don't you come over for dinner and afterward we can watch some TV?"

Even though the industry is putting out a lot of new gadgets there a lot of people see them as just gadgets and actually do not like them.

3D TV's are not even selling:
http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech/124003/report-3d-televisions-not-sellingyet

Christopher Nolan making The Dark Knight Rises in 2D:


http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/660..._dark_knight_rises_in_2d_a_turning_point.html

I put "3d movies are" into the google searchbar, and it autofilled:

"3d movies are a gimmick
3d movies are overrated
3d movies are bullshit
3d movies are crap
3d movies are annoying"

I do not like how 3D viewing requires that one pay attention only to the main element of the scene and trying to look at the background when only the foreground is in focus will always result in blurring even with the best 3D.

This is not to say 3D has no applications or future but I feel it is certainly overblown at this time and may never even catch on for most of the applications I have seen domains here registered for.
 

britishbulldog

DNF Addict
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
6
Great if you have the plural,it is a lot stronger than the singular imho........
 

gilescoley

Level 7
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
807
Reaction score
59
If I search for 3d movies.. I search 3d movies. Not Movies.

Well said Vijaya

And what does it mean to your bottom line ?

It means you need to read the article, and every other article that is coming out by LG, Sony, Panasonic, Samsung and hollywood studios and other electronic manufacturers. You see people are think 3D is just a gimmick obviously wont do the research into and find out what big companies are saying about it and how much they are investing in it, thats natural because I wont be researching how to perform a "colonic irrigation" as this doesn't really interested me, but it makes me laugh is even when huge companeis have already released 3D camcorders, cameras, recorders, players, home cimemas etc etc, you people still think its a gimmick...how can it be, these products are on the shelves already and selling, go and check the stats

Exactly. When every TV and Movie is in 3D will I even say 3D anymore?

"Hey, why don't you come over for dinner and afterward we can watch some 3D TV?"

Or


"Hey, why don't you come over for dinner and afterward we can watch some TV?"

Even though the industry is putting out a lot of new gadgets there a lot of people see them as just gadgets and actually do not like them.

3D TV's are not even selling:
http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech...not-sellingyet

Christopher Nolan making The Dark Knight Rises in 2D:


http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/6608...ing_point.html

I put "3d movies are" into the google searchbar, and it autofilled:

"3d movies are a gimmick
3d movies are overrated
3d movies are bullshit
3d movies are crap
3d movies are annoying"

I do not like how 3D viewing requires that one pay attention only to the main element of the scene and trying to look at the background when only the foreground is in focus will always result in blurring even with the best 3D.

This is not to say 3D has no applications or future but I feel it is certainly overblown at this time and may never even catch on for most of the applications I have seen domains here registered for.


Same applies to you Diabro, its not about the 3D TV/Movies, its about the technology and everything else that comes with it. Maybe remove those blinkers and face reality

When I type in Google blah blah..what a funny line..

Try typing other stuff in Google like...say

"Where can I buy a 3D" and see what comes up

or maybe

"3D Cam" and see what comes up..
 
Last edited:

katherine

Country hopper
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
8,427
Reaction score
1,291
it makes me laugh is even when huge companeis have already released 3D camcorders, cameras, recorders, players, home cimemas etc etc, you people still think its a gimmick...how can it be, these products are on the shelves already and selling, go and check the stats
Doesn't change the fact that the vast majority of '3D' domains floating around are worthless and won't sell.
For people that invest in 3D domains and don't sell any it's just hype without returns.

Don't get me wrong, a few select domains have value in spite of their time-sensitiveness (as demonstrated by Diabro) and will sell. In fact, you have some domains that are decent and stand a chance, but they are above average when compared to the followers portfolios, so perhaps I'm not as optimistic as you are.

A domain like flatscreen.com would be worth considerably less today than a decade ago, because flat is now the norm. As for 3D I could see a longer transition (and shelf life). But there is no future for regfee domains like 3Drandomkeywordthathasnothingtodowith3d.com - not now, not 10 years ago, and not in 10 years either.
 

gilescoley

Level 7
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
807
Reaction score
59
Doesn't change the fact that the vast majority of '3D' domains floating around are worthless and won't sell.

I totally agree with that, you have to try and get decent keyword/products names for them to sell. A lot of people are also regging some decent keyword names but in extensions that struggle, in particular .org and .info, a lot of companies will want the .com and if not, will either settle for .net or their country cctld.
 

Diabro

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
130
Reaction score
13
Well said Vijaya
It means you need to read the article, and every other article that is coming out by LG, Sony, Panasonic, Samsung and hollywood studios and other electronic manufacturers. You see people are think 3D is just a gimmick obviously wont do the research into and find out what big companies are saying about it and how much they are investing in it, thats natural because I wont be researching how to perform a "colonic irrigation" as this doesn't really interested me, but it makes me laugh is even when huge companeis have already released 3D camcorders, cameras, recorders, players, home cimemas etc etc, you people still think its a gimmick...how can it be, these products are on the shelves already and selling, go and check the stats
Yeah how can companies be wrong? *cough* Betamax *cough*
Same applies to you Diabro, its not about the 3D TV/Movies, its about the technology and everything else that comes with it. Maybe remove those blinkers and face reality
What is the reality? Please enlighten me. Tell me how much you have made selling 3D Domains VS the Reg costs you have already spent. Tell me that reality.
When I type in Google blah blah..what a funny line..
Try typing other stuff in Google like...say
"Where can I buy a 3D" and see what comes up
Are people buying 3D? Almost everyone I know now prefers to see non-3D movies over 3D movies. People say it gives them headaches…..others say that it adds nothing to the movie.

Don’t get so defensive though. I have a couple of 3D domains and have nothing against buying good ones. But most are not good ones.
or maybe
"3D Cam" and see what comes up..
 

britishbulldog

DNF Addict
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
6
well i got three 3d domains which i believe are decent:

3dfootball,net
3d4u,com
cheap3d,com
 

gilescoley

Level 7
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
807
Reaction score
59
Yeah how can companies be wrong? *cough* Betamax *cough*

lol, are you really comparing "betamax" to Sony, LG, Panasonic and Samsung...mmm ok, if you must, and if you have a look, Betamax was actually very successful in its day..

What is the reality? Please enlighten me. Tell me how much you have made selling 3D Domains VS the Reg costs you have already spent. Tell me that reality.

You are right, I havent made any money from 3D names, anyone selling decent 3D names now is selling them far too early, I get offers (highest being 7.5K) on my names every week so I am not making any money by choice...its all about patience with developing technology

Are people buying 3D? Almost everyone I know now prefers to see non-3D movies over 3D movies. People say it gives them headaches…..others say that it adds nothing to the movie

Thats not what the box office stats are showing, a lot of my friends prefer normal 2D movies over 3D movies, and to be honest, I prefer watching 2D movies, Im not in this because I love 3D, Im in it because I see a business opportunity, thats it...I would never buy a 3D TV.

You can't go by your friends, you have to look at the global stats and thats shows 3D as being popular. Imagine the CEO of Sony didnt take the plunge into 3D because his friends didn't like it.

Don’t get so defensive though. I have a couple of 3D domains and have nothing against buying good ones. But most are not good ones.

Not being defensive, just giving my opinion on why I think its a good bet, and you're right, buying any 3D names is a waste of money, you have to focus on the good ones. Its always good to get other people's opinions on these topics, it keeps it nice and balanced.
 

Vijaya

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
@britishbulldog

3dfootball,net cheap3d,com nice :)
 

draggar

þórr mjǫlnir
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
7,357
Reaction score
223
I have to admit, this thread has given me some great ideas and even AFTER people discuss it some good TLD domains are still available. ;)

I'll agree, many are junk (just because a domain has 3D in it doesn't mean it's high value) but there are still some good ones out there available to hand-reg.
 

Diabro

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
May 26, 2008
Messages
130
Reaction score
13
lol, are you really comparing "betamax" to Sony, LG, Panasonic and Samsung...mmm ok, if you must, and if you have a look, Betamax was actually very successful in its day..

Yes, I am comparing Betamax to Sony.....BECAUSE Sony released it.

Yes, unlike many of the current 3D technologies, it was a good technology and better in many if not most ways to its competitor, VHS, but it still lost and is considered a fail by Sony. It was not their only fail but all of this is beside the point. The only ones that seem to be interested in 3D are the ones trying to sell the technology. I can go a week, maybe even more, without hearing an actual person saying 3D.

And 3D is nothing new either, it is something that has failed for over 50 years.
You are right, I havent made any money from 3D names, anyone selling decent 3D names now is selling them far too early, I get offers (highest being 7.5K) on my names every week so I am not making any money by choice...its all about patience with developing technology

So you have done this before with developing technology?

I know you have some REALLY good names but I have also seen some bad names from you. You may actually cover your investments with sales but you would probably make more if you did not purchase some of the bad names. I have seen lists here of only bad names.
Thats not what the box office stats are showing, a lot of my friends prefer normal 2D movies over 3D movies, and to be honest, I prefer watching 2D movies, Im not in this because I love 3D, Im in it because I see a business opportunity, thats it...I would never buy a 3D TV.

Which is my point. The good thing for people investing in 3D is that movies and games are not the only 3D technologies coming out.
You can't go by your friends, you have to look at the global stats and thats shows 3D as being popular. Imagine the CEO of Sony didnt take the plunge into 3D because his friends didn't like it.

I believe he made the plunge to sell TV’s. Nothing more. It seems they are having a harder time selling TV’s. People have the large screens and the HD and seem happy.

Do you have global stats showing 3D being popular in sales? Not movie stats because I feel that 3D does not add much to a movie and even a movie like Avatar would have been just as successful without 3D and that was by far the best 3D movie I have seen….and it was still annoying.
Not being defensive, just giving my opinion on why I think its a good bet, and you're right, buying any 3D names is a waste of money, you have to focus on the good ones. Its always good to get other people's opinions on these topics, it keeps it nice and balanced.

OK
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 3) View details

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members Online

Premium Members

Upcoming events

Latest Listings

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom